Decisions with Errors
نویسنده
چکیده
This paper presents a new theory of decision making with errors. The proposed theory explains all major violations of expected utility theory such as the preference reversal phenomenon (including the strong reversals and the preference reversals with the probability equivalents), the common consequence effect (the Allais paradox), the common ratio effect, the violations of the betweenness axiom and the fourfold pattern of risk attitudes. The theory also explains many well-known deviations from the Nash equilibrium such as the positive offers in the dictator game and in the ultimatum game, stopping at the intermediate nodes of the centipede game and “own-payoff” effects in the matching pennies game. JEL Codes: D81, C72, C91, C92
منابع مشابه
Quality Assessment of the Persian Translation of John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men Based on Waddington’s Model of Translation: Application of Method A
Considering the statement that errors can affect the quality of translations, the need to adopt an objective model to analyze these errors has been one of the most debated issues in translation quality assessment. In recent decades, some objective models have emerged with an error analysis nature according to which evaluators can make decisions on the quality of translations. In this study, Met...
متن کاملDo Spreadsheet Errors Lead to Bad Decisions: Perspectives of Executives and Senior Managers
Spreadsheets are commonly used and commonly flawed, but it is not clear how often spreadsheet errors lead to bad decisions. We interviewed 45 executives and senior managers/analysts in the private, public, and non-profit sectors about their experiences with spreadsheet quality control and with errors affecting decision making. Almost all of them said spreadsheet errors are common. Quality contr...
متن کاملSurgeons’ Errors in the Management of Patients with Cervical Cancer
Background and Aim: Generally, in patients with cervical cancer, careful preliminary evaluation is necessary for avoiding improper surgical procedures and making effective clinical decisions for treatment. The aim of this study was to determine surgeons’ errors, which necessitate a combination of surgery and radiotherapy for cervical cancer patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, med...
متن کاملViewpoint of Attending and Medical Residents of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences About Disclosure of a Colleague Medical Error
Regarding how to make decisions on the revelation of medical errors done by colleagues, investigation of physicians' points of view particularly those in educational settings could help the improvement of circumstances to which we encounter medical errors and thus respecting patient's rights. This cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted through a researcher-made questionnaire after perf...
متن کاملFactors Influencing Failure Emergency Evacuation in Work Environments during Fire
One of the necessary measures of saving human life in emergency situations, such as fires, is the safe and swift evacuation of people. The prerequisites for this are to anticipate, identify, and eliminate factors preventing people from leaving buildings in a timely and safe manner while moving them to a safe place [1]. The occurrence of errors caused by engineering, design, human, and psycholog...
متن کاملIntegrated production-Inventory model with price-dependent demand, imperfect quality, and investment in quality and inspection
In practice, manufacturing systems are never perfect and may have low quality outputs. Therefore, different decisions such as reprocessing, sale at lower prices or diminishing are made according to industry and market. This paper investigates the importance of supply chain coordination through developing two models in centralized decision-making for an imperfect quality manufacturing system wit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2007